IBM Survey Reveals How #Energy Efficient U.S. Buildings Really Are

Originally published in Buildings
April 2010
IBM Survey Reveals How Efficient U.S. Buildings Really Are
According to IBM’s survey, U.S. office buildings have failed to keep pace with the revolution in automation that pervades modern life. In the past 12 months, New York City office workers have spent the equivalent of 22.5 years either waiting for an elevator or stuck in one, according to a new IBM survey.

This statistic, paired with the other findings from the survey, indicates that U.S. office buildings have failed to keep pace with the revolution in automation that pervades modern life. The survey indicates that inefficiencies built into office buildings are taking a toll in lost productivity and added costs.

Designed to gauge how intelligent certain automated and green office buildings are, the IBM survey of 6,486 office workers in 16 U.S. cities looks at a number of important factors, including security, office temperature, use of alternative energy sources, environmental and conservation issues, and elevator reliability.

Here are just a few of the survey’s findings:
Nationwide, only 33 percent rated their office buildings “somewhat high,” “very high” or “extremely high” in terms of environmental responsibility. And 65 percent would participate in the redesign of their workspace to make it more environmentally responsible.
31 percent say their office buildings have low-flow toilets.
79 percent of respondents say that they conserve resources such as water or electricity as part of their regular routine at work.
More than one-quarter of respondents (26 percent) say that low-emission and sustainable materials are used to promote improved IAQ in their office buildings.
14 percent report that their office buildings make use of solar energy or another renewable energy source.
75 percent say they would be more likely to conserve resources at work if they were rewarded for the effort.

Advertisements

2 thoughts on “IBM Survey Reveals How #Energy Efficient U.S. Buildings Really Are

  1. Great statistics and insights here. The one that is most interesting to me is that 75% say they would be more likely to conserve resources at work if they were rewarded for it. Earlier in the story, it says 79% conserve resources such as water or electricity as part of their regular routine at work. If 79% are already doing it, why do they need additional incentive to do it? Isn’t the benefit to the environment and the cost savings enough reward? If your company can save on energy costs through employee conservation, that helps the bottom line. When the bottom line improves, so do bonuses. Lets look at the big picture folks.

  2. Thinking out load – Why do people refuse to take a few flights of stairs (save energy, reduce cost, healthier, etc.) and then go to the gym for two hours?

    But really why spend 22.5 year in an elevator when you can make a change.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s